You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of Prospective HLA-B*13:01 Screening to Prevent Dapsone Hypersensitivity Syndrome in Patients With Leprosy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Dermatology, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.5360 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hong Liu, Zhenzhen Wang, Fangfang Bao, Chuan Wang, Lele Sun, Huimin Zhang, Gongqi Yu, Zihao Mi, Jianke Li, Lulu Li, Qing Zhao, Zhenhua Yue, Wei Zhao, Wenjun Yu, Jing Cao, Fei Xiong, Yaru Wang, Zemin Chai, Xiujun Cheng, Yuan Zhang, Fanghui Fu, Xiaoqiao Lang, Xiaoling Wang, Astrid Irwanto, Hana Krismawati, Xi’an Fu, Yonghu Sun, Jiabao You, Jian Liu, Qing Pan, Tongsheng Chu, Dianchang Liu, Shumin Chen, Jianping Shen, Liangbin Yan, Guocheng Zhang, Jianjun Liu, Furen Zhang, Li Xiong, Jun Yang, Jinlan Li, Wei Ke, Ming Li, Yong Ning, Junhao Xiong, Ming Li, Mingzhou Xiong, Bin Yang, Qizhi Duan, Hong Wang, Wei Li, Yanfei Kuang, Junhua Li, Lamei Wang, Qiuyang Cao, Peng Xiao, Bangzhong Xiao, Lianhua Zhang, Zhaoxing Lin, Yaofei Wang, Yunliang Shen, Liying Yan, Wenbin Wu, Hu Zheng, Xianfa Zhan, Wanghua Li, Xiujian Shang, Yujun Xu, Qiao Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 12% |
| United States | 2 | 12% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 29 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 30 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,559,328
of 25,463,091 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Dermatology
#2,048
of 6,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,413
of 368,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Dermatology
#47
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,463,091 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.