↓ Skip to main content

Measuring the organizational impact of training: The need for greater methodological rigor

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resource Development Quarterly, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Measuring the organizational impact of training: The need for greater methodological rigor
Published in
Human Resource Development Quarterly, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/hrdq.21345
Authors

Thomas Garavan, Alma McCarthy, Maura Sheehan, Yanqing Lai, Mark N. K. Saunders, Nicholas Clarke, Ronan Carbery, Valerie Shanahan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 132 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Professor 7 5%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 48 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 41 31%
Social Sciences 17 13%
Psychology 11 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Materials Science 2 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 49 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2019.
All research outputs
#13,648,783
of 24,346,461 outputs
Outputs from Human Resource Development Quarterly
#152
of 297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,490
of 355,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resource Development Quarterly
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,346,461 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.