↓ Skip to main content

Adventurous Physical Activity Environments: A Mainstream Intervention for Mental Health

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
Title
Adventurous Physical Activity Environments: A Mainstream Intervention for Mental Health
Published in
Sports Medicine, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40279-016-0503-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Clough, Susan Houge Mackenzie, Liz Mallabon, Eric Brymer

Abstract

Adventurous physical activity has traditionally been considered the pastime of a small minority of people with deviant personalities or characteristics that compel them to voluntarily take great risks purely for the sake of thrills and excitement. An unintended consequence of these traditional narratives is the relative absence of adventure activities in mainstream health and well-being discourses and in large-scale governmental health initiatives. However, recent research has demonstrated that even the most extreme adventurous physical activities are linked to enhanced psychological health and well-being outcomes. These benefits go beyond traditional 'character building' concepts and emphasize more positive frameworks that rely on the development of effective environmental design. Based on emerging research, this paper demonstrates why adventurous physical activity should be considered a mainstream intervention for positive mental health. Furthermore, the authors argue that understanding how to design environments that effectively encourage appropriate adventure should be considered a serious addition to mainstream health and well-being discourse.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 177 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 17%
Student > Bachelor 28 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Researcher 16 9%
Other 10 6%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 45 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 38 21%
Psychology 29 16%
Social Sciences 18 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 5%
Arts and Humanities 7 4%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 46 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2018.
All research outputs
#3,172,661
of 25,307,660 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#1,690
of 2,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,890
of 304,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#44
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,307,660 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.0. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.