| Title |
Impact of the Cancer Risk Intake System on Patient‐Clinician Discussions of Tamoxifen, Genetic Counseling, and Colonoscopy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, March 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40115.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Celette Sugg Skinner, Susan M. Rawl, Barry K. Moser, Adam H. Buchanan, Linda L. Scott, Victoria L. Champion, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Giovanni Parmigiani, Shelly Clark, David F. Lobach, Lori A. Bastian |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 37 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 25% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2007.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4,427
of 8,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,732
of 85,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#20
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.