↓ Skip to main content

Policy guidelines for the utilization of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections: the UNC SPORE experience

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, November 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Policy guidelines for the utilization of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections: the UNC SPORE experience
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, November 1999
DOI 10.1023/a:1006354627669
Pubmed ID
Authors

L.G. Dressler, J. Geradts, M. Burroughs, D. Cowan, R.C. Millikan, B. Newman

Abstract

Paraffin blocks represent a valuable resource that has allowed investigators to apply today's technology to address scientific questions in a shorter period of time and in more diverse populations than would have been possible with fresh or frozen tissue. However, in addition to being an exhaustible resource, there is concern regarding the appropriate use of these tissues, both with respect to medical or legal considerations and quality control and quality assurance practices. We describe policy guidelines to address these concerns, including: safeguards to address medical/legal and patient confidentiality issues, quality control and quality assurance for tissue sectioning, processing and storage, database management for sample tracking, and scientific review for utilization of specimens. These policies and procedures have been developed and implemented by the University of North Carolina (UNC) Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in the Breast Cancer Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Core laboratory, in collaboration with our study pathologists, participants, and research investigators. It is our hope that the information and experience described here may stimulate discussion that can ultimately lead to a uniform policy for handling formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues in research.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,473,822
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#1,656
of 4,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,142
of 36,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 36,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.