↓ Skip to main content

American Association for Cancer Research

Evaluation of a test for abnormal rectal mucus for early detection of colon cancer.

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, January 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of a test for abnormal rectal mucus for early detection of colon cancer.
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, January 1992
Pubmed ID
Authors

A R Kristal, M S Baker, A D Feld, J T Ylvisaker, K A Morse

Abstract

This report describes the evaluation of a chemical test for T-antigen in rectal mucus as a screening test for colon cancer. The test, called the Mucus Strip Test, detects the disaccharide residue sialic acid-free beta-D-Gal(1-->3)-D-GalNAc or T-antigen, which accumulates in mucus from malignant cells and colonic mucosa adjacent to cancer but not in normal mucosa. Participants were an unselected case series of 660 persons undergoing colonoscopy, excluding those with ulcerative colitis, polyposis, Crohn's disease, or nonspecific inflammatory bowel disease. In the first study (n = 608) rectal mucus was collected after preparation of the bowel for colonoscopy; in the second study (n = 52) a modified protocol was used to collect mucus approximately 2 weeks before colonoscopy and again following preparation for the procedure. Mucus Strip Test results were compared to the diagnosis received after colonoscopy, which was classified as cancer, adenomatous polyp(s), and others (normal). Analyses were also stratified by previous history of large intestinal disease, classified as previous cancer; previous diagnosis of adenomatous polyp(s); or others. In the first study, T-antigen was detected in approximately 30% of mucus samples, and test results were independent of both diagnosis at colonoscopy and previous medical history. In the second study, T-antigen was detected in 85% of samples collected before and 96% of samples collected after preparation for colonoscopy, but test results were again independent of diagnosis and medical history.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 13%
Librarian 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Chemistry 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2021.
All research outputs
#22,834,739
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#4,182
of 4,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,804
of 61,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.