| Title |
“Virtual ileostomy” combined with early endoscopy to avoid a diversion ileostomy in low or ultralow colorectal anastomoses. A preliminary report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00423-019-01776-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Blas Flor-Lorente, Luis Sánchez-Guillén, Gianluca Pellino, Matteo Frasson, Álvaro García-Granero, Marta Ponce, Santiago Domingo, Vicente Paya, Eduardo García-Granero |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 18 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 9% |
| Italy | 5 | 6% |
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Greece | 1 | 1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 29 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 27 | 34% |
| Scientists | 11 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 15% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 61% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2020.
All research outputs
#845,101
of 23,509,982 outputs
Outputs from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#6
of 1,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,011
of 353,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,169 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.