You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Natural Wood Regime in Rivers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioScience, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1093/biosci/biz013 |
| Authors |
Ellen Wohl, Natalie Kramer, Virginia Ruiz-Villanueva, Daniel N Scott, Francesco Comiti, Angela M Gurnell, Herve Piegay, Katherine B Lininger, Kristin L Jaeger, David M Walters, Kurt D Fausch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Poland | 1 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 146 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 33 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 38 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 24 | 16% |
| Engineering | 21 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 41 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,389,685
of 23,709,733 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#875
of 3,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,756
of 353,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#13
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,709,733 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,013 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.