Title |
Microbiology Investigation Criteria for Reporting Objectively (MICRO): a framework for the reporting and interpretation of clinical microbiology data
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12916-019-1301-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Paul Turner, Andrew Fox-Lewis, Poojan Shrestha, David A. B. Dance, Tri Wangrangsimakul, Tomas-Paul Cusack, Clare L. Ling, Jill Hopkins, Tamalee Roberts, Direk Limmathurotsakul, Ben S. Cooper, Susanna Dunachie, Catrin E. Moore, Christiane Dolecek, H. Rogier van Doorn, Philippe J. Guerin, Nicholas P. J. Day, Elizabeth A. Ashley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 14 | 29% |
Vietnam | 3 | 6% |
Spain | 3 | 6% |
Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
Australia | 2 | 4% |
Japan | 2 | 4% |
Thailand | 2 | 4% |
United States | 2 | 4% |
Cambodia | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 14% |
Unknown | 10 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 23 | 47% |
Scientists | 18 | 37% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 132 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 18 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 11% |
Other | 8 | 6% |
Student > Master | 8 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
Other | 29 | 22% |
Unknown | 46 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 22% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 7% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
Other | 17 | 13% |
Unknown | 57 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,086,189
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#755
of 4,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,841
of 365,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#19
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,091 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.