↓ Skip to main content

Multi-ancestry genome-wide gene–smoking interaction study of 387,272 individuals identifies new loci associated with serum lipids

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
36 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
352 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multi-ancestry genome-wide gene–smoking interaction study of 387,272 individuals identifies new loci associated with serum lipids
Published in
Nature Genetics, March 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41588-019-0378-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy R. Bentley, Yun J. Sung, Michael R. Brown, Thomas W. Winkler, Aldi T. Kraja, Ioanna Ntalla, Karen Schwander, Daniel I. Chasman, Elise Lim, Xuan Deng, Xiuqing Guo, Jingmin Liu, Yingchang Lu, Ching-Yu Cheng, Xueling Sim, Dina Vojinovic, Jennifer E. Huffman, Solomon K. Musani, Changwei Li, Mary F. Feitosa, Melissa A. Richard, Raymond Noordam, Jenna Baker, Guanjie Chen, Hugues Aschard, Traci M. Bartz, Jingzhong Ding, Rajkumar Dorajoo, Alisa K. Manning, Tuomo Rankinen, Albert V. Smith, Salman M. Tajuddin, Wei Zhao, Mariaelisa Graff, Maris Alver, Mathilde Boissel, Jin Fang Chai, Xu Chen, Jasmin Divers, Evangelos Evangelou, Chuan Gao, Anuj Goel, Yanick Hagemeijer, Sarah E. Harris, Fernando P. Hartwig, Meian He, Andrea R. V. R. Horimoto, Fang-Chi Hsu, Yi-Jen Hung, Anne U. Jackson, Anuradhani Kasturiratne, Pirjo Komulainen, Brigitte Kühnel, Karin Leander, Keng-Hung Lin, Jian’an Luan, Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen, Nana Matoba, Ilja M. Nolte, Maik Pietzner, Bram Prins, Muhammad Riaz, Antonietta Robino, M. Abdullah Said, Nicole Schupf, Robert A. Scott, Tamar Sofer, Alena Stancáková, Fumihiko Takeuchi, Bamidele O. Tayo, Peter J. van der Most, Tibor V. Varga, Tzung-Dau Wang, Yajuan Wang, Erin B. Ware, Wanqing Wen, Yong-Bing Xiang, Lisa R. Yanek, Weihua Zhang, Jing Hua Zhao, Adebowale Adeyemo, Saima Afaq, Najaf Amin, Marzyeh Amini, Dan E. Arking, Zorayr Arzumanyan, Tin Aung, Christie Ballantyne, R. Graham Barr, Lawrence F. Bielak, Eric Boerwinkle, Erwin P. Bottinger, Ulrich Broeckel, Morris Brown, Brian E. Cade, Archie Campbell, Mickaël Canouil, Sabanayagam Charumathi, Yii-Der Ida Chen, Kaare Christensen, Maria Pina Concas, John M. Connell, Lisa de las Fuentes, H. Janaka de Silva, Paul S. de Vries, Ayo Doumatey, Qing Duan, Charles B. Eaton, Ruben N. Eppinga, Jessica D. Faul, James S. Floyd, Nita G. Forouhi, Terrence Forrester, Yechiel Friedlander, Ilaria Gandin, He Gao, Mohsen Ghanbari, Sina A. Gharib, Bruna Gigante, Franco Giulianini, Hans J. Grabe, C. Charles Gu, Tamara B. Harris, Sami Heikkinen, Chew-Kiat Heng, Makoto Hirata, James E. Hixson, M. Arfan Ikram, Yucheng Jia, Roby Joehanes, Craig Johnson, Jost Bruno Jonas, Anne E. Justice, Tomohiro Katsuya, Chiea Chuen Khor, Tuomas O. Kilpeläinen, Woon-Puay Koh, Ivana Kolcic, Charles Kooperberg, Jose E. Krieger, Stephen B. Kritchevsky, Michiaki Kubo, Johanna Kuusisto, Timo A. Lakka, Carl D. Langefeld, Claudia Langenberg, Lenore J. Launer, Benjamin Lehne, Cora E. Lewis, Yize Li, Jingjing Liang, Shiow Lin, Ching-Ti Liu, Jianjun Liu, Kiang Liu, Marie Loh, Kurt K. Lohman, Tin Louie, Anna Luzzi, Reedik Mägi, Anubha Mahajan, Ani W. Manichaikul, Colin A. McKenzie, Thomas Meitinger, Andres Metspalu, Yuri Milaneschi, Lili Milani, Karen L. Mohlke, Yukihide Momozawa, Andrew P. Morris, Alison D. Murray, Mike A. Nalls, Matthias Nauck, Christopher P. Nelson, Kari E. North, Jeffrey R. O’Connell, Nicholette D. Palmer, George J. Papanicolau, Nancy L. Pedersen, Annette Peters, Patricia A. Peyser, Ozren Polasek, Neil Poulter, Olli T. Raitakari, Alex P. Reiner, Frida Renström, Treva K. Rice, Stephen S. Rich, Jennifer G. Robinson, Lynda M. Rose, Frits R. Rosendaal, Igor Rudan, Carsten O. Schmidt, Pamela J. Schreiner, William R. Scott, Peter Sever, Yuan Shi, Stephen Sidney, Mario Sims, Jennifer A. Smith, Harold Snieder, John M. Starr, Konstantin Strauch, Heather M. Stringham, Nicholas Y. Q. Tan, Hua Tang, Kent D. Taylor, Yik Ying Teo, Yih Chung Tham, Henning Tiemeier, Stephen T. Turner, André G. Uitterlinden, Diana van Heemst, Melanie Waldenberger, Heming Wang, Lan Wang, Lihua Wang, Wen Bin Wei, Christine A. Williams, Gregory Wilson, Mary K. Wojczynski, Jie Yao, Kristin Young, Caizheng Yu, Jian-Min Yuan, Jie Zhou, Alan B. Zonderman, Diane M. Becker, Michael Boehnke, Donald W. Bowden, John C. Chambers, Richard S. Cooper, Ulf de Faire, Ian J. Deary, Paul Elliott, Tõnu Esko, Martin Farrall, Paul W. Franks, Barry I. Freedman, Philippe Froguel, Paolo Gasparini, Christian Gieger, Bernardo L. Horta, Jyh-Ming Jimmy Juang, Yoichiro Kamatani, Candace M. Kammerer, Norihiro Kato, Jaspal S. Kooner, Markku Laakso, Cathy C. Laurie, I-Te Lee, Terho Lehtimäki, Patrik K. E. Magnusson, Albertine J. Oldehinkel, Brenda W. J. H. Penninx, Alexandre C. Pereira, Rainer Rauramaa, Susan Redline, Nilesh J. Samani, James Scott, Xiao-Ou Shu, Pim van der Harst, Lynne E. Wagenknecht, Jun-Sing Wang, Ya Xing Wang, Nicholas J. Wareham, Hugh Watkins, David R. Weir, Ananda R. Wickremasinghe, Tangchun Wu, Eleftheria Zeggini, Wei Zheng, Claude Bouchard, Michele K. Evans, Vilmundur Gudnason, Sharon L. R. Kardia, Yongmei Liu, Bruce M. Psaty, Paul M. Ridker, Rob M. van Dam, Dennis O. Mook-Kanamori, Myriam Fornage, Michael A. Province, Tanika N. Kelly, Ervin R. Fox, Caroline Hayward, Cornelia M. van Duijn, E. Shyong Tai, Tien Yin Wong, Ruth J. F. Loos, Nora Franceschini, Jerome I. Rotter, Xiaofeng Zhu, Laura J. Bierut, W. James Gauderman, Kenneth Rice, Patricia B. Munroe, Alanna C. Morrison, Dabeeru C. Rao, Charles N. Rotimi, L. Adrienne Cupples

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 352 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 352 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 14%
Student > Master 31 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 7%
Student > Bachelor 25 7%
Professor 20 6%
Other 53 15%
Unknown 149 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 5%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Other 38 11%
Unknown 164 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,028,019
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#2,741
of 7,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,701
of 367,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#52
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.