You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genomic subtyping and therapeutic targeting of acute erythroleukemia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41588-019-0375-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ilaria Iacobucci, Ji Wen, Manja Meggendorfer, John K. Choi, Lei Shi, Stanley B. Pounds, Catherine L. Carmichael, Katherine E. Masih, Sarah M. Morris, R. Coleman Lindsley, Laura J. Janke, Thomas B. Alexander, Guangchun Song, Chunxu Qu, Yongjin Li, Debbie Payne-Turner, Daisuke Tomizawa, Nobutaka Kiyokawa, Marcus Valentine, Virginia Valentine, Giuseppe Basso, Franco Locatelli, Eric J. Enemark, Shirley K. Y. Kham, Allen E. J. Yeoh, Xiaotu Ma, Xin Zhou, Edgar Sioson, Michael Rusch, Rhonda E. Ries, Elliot Stieglitz, Stephen P. Hunger, Andrew H. Wei, L Bik To, Ian D. Lewis, Richard J. D’Andrea, Benjamin T. Kile, Anna L. Brown, Hamish S. Scott, Christopher N. Hahn, Paula Marlton, Deqing Pei, Cheng Cheng, Mignon L. Loh, Benjamin L. Ebert, Soheil Meshinchi, Torsten Haferlach, Charles G. Mullighan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 45% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Hungary | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 61% |
| Scientists | 8 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 127 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 20% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 37 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 43 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2019.
All research outputs
#502,939
of 24,998,746 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#1,023
of 7,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,465
of 357,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#33
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,998,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.