↓ Skip to main content

History matters: contemporary versus historic population structure of bobcats in the New England region, USA

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Genetics, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
History matters: contemporary versus historic population structure of bobcats in the New England region, USA
Published in
Conservation Genetics, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10592-019-01170-8
Authors

Rory P. Carroll, Marian K. Litvaitis, Sarah J. Clements, Clark L. Stevens, John A. Litvaitis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Student > Master 6 19%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 45%
Environmental Science 6 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unknown 9 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,653,357
of 23,138,859 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#153
of 1,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,569
of 351,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#12
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,138,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.