| Title |
Optimization of the treatment with beta-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients—guidelines from the French Society of Pharmacology and Therapeutics (Société Française de Pharmacologie et Thérapeutique—SFPT) and the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (Société Française d’Anesthésie et Réanimation—SFAR)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2378-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Romain Guilhaumou, Sihem Benaboud, Youssef Bennis, Claire Dahyot-Fizelier, Eric Dailly, Peggy Gandia, Sylvain Goutelle, Sandrine Lefeuvre, Nicolas Mongardon, Claire Roger, Julien Scala-Bertola, Florian Lemaitre, Marc Garnier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 276 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 36 | 13% |
| France | 27 | 10% |
| United States | 21 | 8% |
| Colombia | 12 | 4% |
| Mexico | 9 | 3% |
| Argentina | 8 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 6 | 2% |
| Italy | 4 | 1% |
| Chile | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 35 | 13% |
| Unknown | 115 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 208 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 38 | 14% |
| Scientists | 24 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 282 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 9% |
| Researcher | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 57 | 20% |
| Unknown | 103 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 88 | 31% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 51 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 2% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Unknown | 114 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 194. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2023.
All research outputs
#210,621
of 25,882,826 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#87
of 6,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,409
of 366,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#4
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,882,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.