↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosing and responding to causes of failure to eradicate invasive rodents

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Invasions, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Diagnosing and responding to causes of failure to eradicate invasive rodents
Published in
Biological Invasions, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10530-019-01976-0
Authors

Peter J. Kappes, Alexander L. Bond, James C. Russell, Ross M. Wanless

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 20%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 3 9%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 8 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 46%
Environmental Science 3 9%
Unspecified 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2019.
All research outputs
#15,607,542
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#1,824
of 2,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,335
of 358,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#41
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.