| Title |
Wildlife, human and environmental costs of using lead ammunition: An economic review and analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-019-01157-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deborah J. Pain, Ian Dickie, Rhys E. Green, Niels Kanstrup, Ruth Cromie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Latvia | 3 | 30% |
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Belarus | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 9 | 16% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 20 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,174,759
of 24,089,711 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#188
of 1,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,252
of 356,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#7
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,089,711 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.