↓ Skip to main content

Logarithmic nonlinearity in theories of quantum gravity: Origin of time and observational consequences

Overview of attention for article published in Gravitation and Cosmology, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 210)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Logarithmic nonlinearity in theories of quantum gravity: Origin of time and observational consequences
Published in
Gravitation and Cosmology, November 2010
DOI 10.1134/s0202289310040067
Authors

K. G. Zloshchastiev

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 25%
Lecturer 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 3 75%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,588,614
of 23,138,859 outputs
Outputs from Gravitation and Cosmology
#27
of 210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,575
of 181,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gravitation and Cosmology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,138,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 210 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them