↓ Skip to main content

Research Priorities in Neurocritical Care

Overview of attention for article published in Neurocritical Care, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Research Priorities in Neurocritical Care
Published in
Neurocritical Care, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s12028-011-9611-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. G. Geocadin, T. P. Bleck, W. J. Koroshetz, C. S. Robertson, O. O. Zaidat, P. D. LeRoux, C. A. C. Wijman, J. I. Suarez

Abstract

This summary of the last session of the First Neurocritical Care Research Conference reviews the discussions about research priorities in neurocritical care. The first presentation reviewed current projects funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke at the National Institutes of Health and potential models to follow including an independent Neurocritical Care Network or the creation of such a network with the goal of collaborating with already existing ones. Experienced neurointensivists then presented their views on the most common and important research questions that need to be answered and investigated in the field. Finally, utility of clinical registries was discussed emphasizing their importance as hypothesis generators. During the group discussion, interests in comparative effectiveness research, the use of physiological endpoints from monitoring and alternate trial design were expressed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Postgraduate 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Professor 3 9%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 47%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 9 26%