↓ Skip to main content

Recreatief lachgasgebruik en gezondheidsrisico’s

Overview of attention for article published in JGZ Tijdschrift voor jeugdgezondheidszorg, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Recreatief lachgasgebruik en gezondheidsrisico’s
Published in
JGZ Tijdschrift voor jeugdgezondheidszorg, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12452-018-00166-z
Authors

S. J. Luijk, L. M. Nijkamp

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 50%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2020.
All research outputs
#6,528,946
of 23,138,859 outputs
Outputs from JGZ Tijdschrift voor jeugdgezondheidszorg
#9
of 32 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,718
of 470,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JGZ Tijdschrift voor jeugdgezondheidszorg
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,138,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one scored the same or higher as 23 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them