↓ Skip to main content

Short-term effects of carbendazim on the gross and microscopic features of the testes of Japanese quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica)

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Structure and Function, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Short-term effects of carbendazim on the gross and microscopic features of the testes of Japanese quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica)
Published in
Brain Structure and Function, July 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00429-005-0001-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. A. Aire

Abstract

Carbendazim, a metabolite of benomyl which is widely used as a fungicide, has been found to cause testicular and epididymal damage in laboratory rats, mice and hamsters. No studies of the effects of this chemical on the reproductive organs of birds have been reported previously. This report is that of an investigation on the response of the testis of the Japanese quail to experimental administration of this chemical in sexually mature and active birds. A single dose (400 mg/kg body weight) of carbendazim was administered orally to 20 quails that were sacrificed thereafter at 5 h, 3, 8 and 13 days post-exposure, at five birds spatio-temporally. Five birds acted as control. Testis weights and seminiferous tubular diameter as well as epithelial height decreased significantly from 8 day post-exposure. Epithelial histology was remarkably disrupted, and cessation of spermatogenesis occurred at 13 day post-administration of the chemical. Degenerative changes were uniform in each testis, and not patchy or multi-focal, as previously reported in the rat. The observed histological changes in the testis, due to carbendazim, were capable of causing prolonged infertility in exposed birds.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 21%
Student > Master 5 21%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 6 25%
Environmental Science 4 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,356,343
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Brain Structure and Function
#568
of 2,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,121
of 69,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Structure and Function
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.