↓ Skip to main content

Exploring monovalent copper compounds with oxygen and hydrogen

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring monovalent copper compounds with oxygen and hydrogen
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2012
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1115834109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pavel A. Korzhavyi, Inna L. Soroka, Eyvaz I. Isaev, Christina Lilja, Börje Johansson

Abstract

New important applications of copper metal, e.g., in the areas of hydrogen production, fuel cell operation, and spent nuclear fuel disposal, require accurate knowledge of the physical and chemical properties of stable and metastable copper compounds. Among the copper(I) compounds with oxygen and hydrogen, cuprous oxide Cu(2)O is the only one stable and the best studied. Other such compounds are less known (CuH) or totally unknown (CuOH) due to their instability relative to the oxide. Here we combine quantum-mechanical calculations with experimental studies to search for possible compounds of monovalent copper. Cuprous hydride (CuH) and cuprous hydroxide (CuOH) are proved to exist in solid form. We establish the chemical and physical properties of these compounds, thereby filling the existing gaps in our understanding of hydrogen- and oxygen-related phenomena in Cu metal.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
China 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Serbia 1 1%
Unknown 67 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 42%
Researcher 14 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 20 27%
Chemistry 16 22%
Physics and Astronomy 10 14%
Engineering 6 8%
Chemical Engineering 4 5%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 12 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2012.
All research outputs
#6,195,055
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#56,795
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,686
of 253,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#449
of 827 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 827 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.