↓ Skip to main content

“Fake news” and the defection of 2012 Obama voters in the 2016 presidential election

Overview of attention for article published in Electoral Studies, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 1,403)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
11 X users
reddit
3 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“Fake news” and the defection of 2012 Obama voters in the 2016 presidential election
Published in
Electoral Studies, October 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.electstud.2019.03.006
Authors

Richard Gunther, Paul A. Beck, Erik C. Nisbet

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Lecturer 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 22 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 24 36%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 6%
Psychology 3 4%
Computer Science 3 4%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 24 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#398,580
of 25,388,837 outputs
Outputs from Electoral Studies
#43
of 1,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,638
of 357,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Electoral Studies
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,837 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,403 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.