↓ Skip to main content

Geochemical study of carbonate concretions from the aqueduct of Nîmes (southern France): a climatic record for the first centuries AD?

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Geochemical study of carbonate concretions from the aqueduct of Nîmes (southern France): a climatic record for the first centuries AD?
Published in
Scientific Reports, March 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-41620-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yacine Benjelloun, Julie Carlut, Jean-François Hélie, Gilles Chazot, Laurence Le Callonnec

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Professor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 38%
Arts and Humanities 3 19%
Environmental Science 2 13%
Chemistry 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2019.
All research outputs
#17,148,135
of 25,191,684 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#88,046
of 138,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,107
of 358,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2,781
of 4,136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,191,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 138,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.