You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
European naval diets in the sixteenth century: A quantitative method for comparative and nutritional analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1080/01615440.2019.1580170 |
| Authors |
Patrick W. Hayes, J. A. Matthews, Bernard Allaire, Poul Holm |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 5 | 23% |
| Canada | 3 | 14% |
| Portugal | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 68% |
| Scientists | 7 | 32% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Psychology | 1 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,970,331
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History
#16
of 182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,134
of 364,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them