↓ Skip to main content

Reconsidering the Family History in Primary Care

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, March 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
288 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
Title
Reconsidering the Family History in Primary Care
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, March 2004
DOI 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30401.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eugene C Rich, Wylie Burke, Caryl J Heaton, Susanne Haga, Linda Pinsky, M Priscilla Short, Louise Acheson

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to review the role of the family history in predictive genetic testing, describe how family history taking is practiced in adult primary care, identify the current barriers to appropriate application of the family history, and outline the requirements for a new family history tool for primary care. We reviewed current perspectives on the family history, identifying key references in the medical literature and web-based family history tools through discussions with multiple content experts in clinical genetics, family medicine, and internal medicine. We conducted a Medline query using the search terms family history and primary care to identify references from the past 10 years. To illustrate the usefulness of family history information, we calculated the predictive value of family history and genetic information for familial adenomatous polyposis using current references and standard formulas. We identified paper and web-based family history tools through discussions with content experts. We also conducted a search on the World Wide Web to identify resources for electronic medical record and family history. The family history is the most important tool for diagnosis and risk assessment in medical genetics, and promises to serve as a critical element in the use of predictive genetic testing in primary care. Traditional medical education about family history has often been unsophisticated and use of family history in adult primary care has been limited, compounded by multiple substantive barriers. Although there are numerous paper and computer-based aides for taking the family history, none currently meets all the needs of adult primary care. The patient's family history remains a critical element in risk assessment for many conditions, but substantive barriers impede application in primary care practice, and evidence for its contribution to improved health outcomes is limited in this setting. Short of radical changes in reimbursement, new tools will be required to aid primary care physicians in the efficient collection and application of patient family history in the era of genetic testing.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 153 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 13%
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Other 13 8%
Other 40 24%
Unknown 26 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 37%
Social Sciences 13 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 5%
Computer Science 9 5%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 37 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,798,611
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,634
of 8,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,575
of 63,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#18
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.