↓ Skip to main content

Comparative efficacy and safety for different chemotherapy regimens used concurrently with thoracic radiation for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analy…

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Oncology, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Comparative efficacy and safety for different chemotherapy regimens used concurrently with thoracic radiation for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Published in
Radiation Oncology, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13014-019-1239-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tingting Liu, Zheng He, Jun Dang, Guang Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 12 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#6,489,936
of 23,860,205 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#284
of 2,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,082
of 353,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,860,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.