You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ニホンアマガエルとトウキョウダルマガエルのツマグロヨコバイに対する捕食量の実験的解析
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE SOCIETY OF PLANT PROTECTION OF NORTH JAPAN, December 2004
|
| DOI | 10.11455/kitanihon1966.2004.176 |
| Authors |
小野 亨, 城所 隆, 小山 淳 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 50% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,692,145
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from ANNUAL REPORT OF THE SOCIETY OF PLANT PROTECTION OF NORTH JAPAN
#3
of 42 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,950
of 151,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ANNUAL REPORT OF THE SOCIETY OF PLANT PROTECTION OF NORTH JAPAN
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one scored the same or higher as 39 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them