| Title |
A new eosauropterygian (Diapsida: Sauropterygia) from the Middle Triassic of Luoping, Yunnan Province
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Earth Science, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12583-012-0231-z |
| Authors |
Long Cheng, Xiaohong Chen, Xiongwei Zeng, Yongjian Cai |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,850,777
of 24,341,979 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Earth Science
#27
of 89 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,844
of 253,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Earth Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,341,979 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 89 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them