↓ Skip to main content

Marginal erosive discovertebral ”Romanus” lesions in ankylosing spondylitis demonstrated by contrast enhanced Gd-DTPA magnetic resonance imaging

Overview of attention for article published in Skeletal Radiology, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Marginal erosive discovertebral ”Romanus” lesions in ankylosing spondylitis demonstrated by contrast enhanced Gd-DTPA magnetic resonance imaging
Published in
Skeletal Radiology, January 2000
DOI 10.1007/s002560050005
Pubmed ID
Authors

V. Jevtic, M. Kos-Golja, B. Rozman, I. McCall

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 27 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 5 17%
Student > Master 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 8 27%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 80%
Computer Science 1 3%
Unknown 5 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,588,614
of 23,138,859 outputs
Outputs from Skeletal Radiology
#444
of 1,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,853
of 108,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Skeletal Radiology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,138,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them