| Title |
Improving engagement with healthcare in hepatitis C: a randomised controlled trial of a peer support intervention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-019-1300-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helen R. Stagg, Julian Surey, Marie Francis, Jennifer MacLellan, Graham R. Foster, André Charlett, Ibrahim Abubakar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 50% |
| Australia | 2 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 30% |
| Scientists | 3 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 128 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 50 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 8% |
| Psychology | 6 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 51 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,529,667
of 24,873,243 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,656
of 3,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,769
of 358,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#39
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,873,243 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.