↓ Skip to main content

伝統的手法で抽出されたベニバナ色素膜の緑色金属光沢について

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of The Society of Photographic Science and Technology of Japan, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 135)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
伝統的手法で抽出されたベニバナ色素膜の緑色金属光沢について
Published in
Journal of The Society of Photographic Science and Technology of Japan, March 2019
DOI 10.11454/photogrst.81.65
Authors

矢島 仁, 佐々木 麻衣子, 高橋 圭子, 平岡 一幸, 大嶋 正人, 山田 勝実

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,529,883
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of The Society of Photographic Science and Technology of Japan
#10
of 135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,638
of 369,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of The Society of Photographic Science and Technology of Japan
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 135 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them