↓ Skip to main content

Faculty Grading of Quantitative Problems: A Mismatch between Values and Practice

Overview of attention for article published in Research in Science Education, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 671)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Faculty Grading of Quantitative Problems: A Mismatch between Values and Practice
Published in
Research in Science Education, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11165-011-9268-8
Authors

Heather L. Petcovic, Herb Fynewever, Charles Henderson, Jacinta M. Mutambuki, Jeffrey A. Barney

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
Unknown 29 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 26%
Researcher 6 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 16%
Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 35%
Physics and Astronomy 4 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 13%
Chemistry 4 13%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2013.
All research outputs
#4,139,425
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Research in Science Education
#49
of 671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,607
of 250,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research in Science Education
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 671 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them