↓ Skip to main content

A Systematic Review of Productivity in Economic Evaluations of Workplace Interventions: A Need for Reporting Criteria?

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
A Systematic Review of Productivity in Economic Evaluations of Workplace Interventions: A Need for Reporting Criteria?
Published in
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40258-019-00473-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheryl Jones, Suzanne M. M. Verstappen, Katherine Payne

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 20 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 24 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,793,255
of 25,413,176 outputs
Outputs from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#360
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,064
of 364,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,413,176 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.