You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Metagenomic analysis of colorectal cancer datasets identifies cross-cohort microbial diagnostic signatures and a link with choline degradation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Medicine, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41591-019-0405-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew Maltez Thomas, Paolo Manghi, Francesco Asnicar, Edoardo Pasolli, Federica Armanini, Moreno Zolfo, Francesco Beghini, Serena Manara, Nicolai Karcher, Chiara Pozzi, Sara Gandini, Davide Serrano, Sonia Tarallo, Antonio Francavilla, Gaetano Gallo, Mario Trompetto, Giulio Ferrero, Sayaka Mizutani, Hirotsugu Shiroma, Satoshi Shiba, Tatsuhiro Shibata, Shinichi Yachida, Takuji Yamada, Jakob Wirbel, Petra Schrotz-King, Cornelia M. Ulrich, Hermann Brenner, Manimozhiyan Arumugam, Peer Bork, Georg Zeller, Francesca Cordero, Emmanuel Dias-Neto, João Carlos Setubal, Adrian Tett, Barbara Pardini, Maria Rescigno, Levi Waldron, Alessio Naccarati, Nicola Segata |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 274 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 54 | 20% |
| Italy | 18 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 18 | 7% |
| Spain | 16 | 6% |
| Australia | 11 | 4% |
| France | 10 | 4% |
| Germany | 9 | 3% |
| India | 9 | 3% |
| Japan | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 46 | 17% |
| Unknown | 79 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 138 | 50% |
| Scientists | 114 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 3% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 899 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 899 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 127 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 125 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 93 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 68 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 38 | 4% |
| Other | 122 | 14% |
| Unknown | 326 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 187 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 103 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 61 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 29 | 3% |
| Other | 87 | 10% |
| Unknown | 355 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 349. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2026.
All research outputs
#118,976
of 34,846,597 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#674
of 11,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,034
of 393,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#9
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,846,597 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 110.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.