↓ Skip to main content

Review of ependymomas: assessment of consensus in pathological diagnosis and correlations with genetic profiles and outcome

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Tumor Pathology, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Review of ependymomas: assessment of consensus in pathological diagnosis and correlations with genetic profiles and outcome
Published in
Brain Tumor Pathology, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10014-019-00338-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Atsushi Sasaki, Junko Hirato, Takanori Hirose, Kohei Fukuoka, Yonehiro Kanemura, Naohito Hashimoto, Yoshinori Kodama, Koichi Ichimura, Hiroaki Sakamoto, Ryo Nishikawa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Researcher 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 33%
Neuroscience 6 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 9 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2019.
All research outputs
#18,675,458
of 23,138,859 outputs
Outputs from Brain Tumor Pathology
#96
of 170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,462
of 351,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Tumor Pathology
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,138,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 170 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.