| Title |
Patient prioritization tools and their effectiveness in non-emergency healthcare services: a systematic review protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-019-0992-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julien Déry, Angel Ruiz, François Routhier, Marie-Pierre Gagnon, André Côté, Daoud Ait-Kadi, Valérie Bélanger, Simon Deslauriers, Marie-Eve Lamontagne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 44 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 46 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,905,728
of 24,719,968 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#523
of 2,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,827
of 357,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#13
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,719,968 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.