↓ Skip to main content

Incisional hernia, midline versus low transverse incision: what is the ideal incision for specimen extraction and hand-assisted laparoscopy?

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Incisional hernia, midline versus low transverse incision: what is the ideal incision for specimen extraction and hand-assisted laparoscopy?
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, August 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00464-010-1309-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashwin deSouza, Bastian Domajnko, John Park, Slawomir Marecik, Leela Prasad, Herand Abcarian

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 16%
Student > Postgraduate 9 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 11%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 5 8%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 64%
Computer Science 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 18 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2017.
All research outputs
#14,251,396
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#3,249
of 6,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,988
of 93,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#18
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,044 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.