↓ Skip to main content

Beyond the bacterium: planctomycetes challenge our concepts of microbial structure and function

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Microbiology, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
400 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
586 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Beyond the bacterium: planctomycetes challenge our concepts of microbial structure and function
Published in
Nature Reviews Microbiology, May 2011
DOI 10.1038/nrmicro2578
Pubmed ID
Authors

John A. Fuerst, Evgeny Sagulenko

Abstract

Planctomycetes form a distinct phylum of the domain Bacteria and possess unusual features such as intracellular compartmentalization and a lack of peptidoglycan in their cell walls. Remarkably, cells of the genus Gemmata even contain a membrane-bound nucleoid analogous to the eukaryotic nucleus. Moreover, the so-called 'anammox' planctomycetes have a unique anaerobic, autotrophic metabolism that includes the ability to oxidize ammonium; this process is dependent on a characteristic membrane-bound cell compartment called the anammoxosome, which might be a functional analogue of the eukaryotic mitochondrion. The compartmentalization of planctomycetes challenges our hypotheses regarding the origins of eukaryotic organelles. Furthermore, the recent discovery of both an endocytosis-like ability and proteins homologous to eukaryotic clathrin in a planctomycete marks this phylum as one to watch for future research on the origin and evolution of the eukaryotic cell.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 586 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 2%
Germany 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 558 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 143 24%
Researcher 114 19%
Student > Master 79 13%
Student > Bachelor 67 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 4%
Other 84 14%
Unknown 75 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 277 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 63 11%
Environmental Science 63 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 22 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 19 3%
Other 48 8%
Unknown 94 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,921,473
of 24,648,202 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Microbiology
#842
of 2,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,276
of 115,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Microbiology
#7
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,648,202 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.