| Title |
Detection of E. coli using a microfluidics-based antibody biochip detection system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Fresenius' Journal of Analytical Chemistry, February 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s002160000660 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David L. Stokes, G. D. Griffin, Tuan Vo-Dinh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 36% |
| Researcher | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 22 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 11% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Fresenius' Journal of Analytical Chemistry
#38
of 134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,134
of 113,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fresenius' Journal of Analytical Chemistry
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.