↓ Skip to main content

The relationship between retinal vessel tortuosity, diameter, and transmural pressure

Overview of attention for article published in Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, September 1986
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
The relationship between retinal vessel tortuosity, diameter, and transmural pressure
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, September 1986
DOI 10.1007/bf02173368
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. A. Kylstra, T. Wierzbicki, M. L. Wolbarsht, M. B. Landers, E. Stefansson

Abstract

Increases in retinal vein tortuosity are thought to be caused by increases in vascular transmural pressure. We have attempted to determine the relationship between retinal vessel tortuosity, diameter, and transmural pressure by examining the effects of changes in transmural pressure on latex tubes with fixed ends. As the transmural pressure is raised, tube diameter increases, but tortuosity does not begin increasing until a critical pressure is reached. Above the critical pressure, tortuosity increases more rapidly than diameter. Our results support the above hypothesis and also suggest that at high transmural pressures, retinal vessel tortuosity is a more sensitive indicator than is the diameter of changes in retinal venous transmural pressure, but diameter is more sensitive than tortuosity at lower pressures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 9%
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 19 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 23%
Student > Master 5 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Engineering 3 14%
Physics and Astronomy 2 9%
Neuroscience 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 32%