↓ Skip to main content

Differentiation of Maize Ear Rot Pathogens, on Growth Media, with Near Infrared Hyperspectral Imaging

Overview of attention for article published in Food Analytical Methods, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Differentiation of Maize Ear Rot Pathogens, on Growth Media, with Near Infrared Hyperspectral Imaging
Published in
Food Analytical Methods, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12161-019-01490-y
Authors

Paul J. Williams, Cenette Bezuidenhout, Lindy J. Rose

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Unknown 7 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2019.
All research outputs
#14,910,537
of 23,138,859 outputs
Outputs from Food Analytical Methods
#167
of 583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,478
of 351,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Analytical Methods
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,138,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 583 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.