| Title |
Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a task-based weight management group programme
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-6679-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hayden McRobbie, Peter Hajek, Sarrah Peerbux, Brennan C. Kahan, Sandra Eldridge, Dominic Trépel, Steve Parrott, Chris Griffiths, Sarah Snuggs, Katie Myers Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 4 | 44% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 200 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 12% |
| Researcher | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 18% |
| Unknown | 72 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 87 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,716,160
of 24,788,795 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,190
of 16,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,724
of 357,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#78
of 302 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,788,795 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,428 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 302 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.