↓ Skip to main content

Ensemble optimisation, multiple constraints and overconfidence: a case study with future Australian precipitation change

Overview of attention for article published in Climate Dynamics, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Ensemble optimisation, multiple constraints and overconfidence: a case study with future Australian precipitation change
Published in
Climate Dynamics, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00382-019-04690-8
Authors

Nadja Herger, Gab Abramowitz, Steven Sherwood, Reto Knutti, Oliver Angélil, Scott A. Sisson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 33%
Researcher 5 21%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Lecturer 2 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 33%
Environmental Science 6 25%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Mathematics 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,530,030
of 23,392,375 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#1,888
of 5,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,265
of 352,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#48
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,392,375 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.