| Title |
Laparoscopic versus hybrid approach for treatment of incisional ventral hernia: a prospective randomised multicentre study, 1-year results
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-019-06735-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mirella Ahonen-Siirtola, Terhi Nevala, Jaana Vironen, Jyrki Kössi, Tarja Pinta, Susanna Niemeläinen, Ulla Keränen, Jaana Ward, Pälvi Vento, Jukka Karvonen, Pasi Ohtonen, Jyrki Mäkelä, Tero Rautio |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| Brazil | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 36 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 40 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,229,924
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,323
of 7,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,878
of 368,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#24
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.