↓ Skip to main content

Role of conceptual knowledge in learning and retention of conditioned fear

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Psychology, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role of conceptual knowledge in learning and retention of conditioned fear
Published in
Biological Psychology, November 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.11.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph E. Dunsmoor, Alex Martin, Kevin S. LaBar

Abstract

Associating sensory cues with aversive outcomes is a relatively basic process shared across species. Yet higher-order cognitive processes likely contribute to associative fear learning in many circumstances, especially in humans. Here we ask whether fears can be acquired based on conceptual knowledge of object categories, and whether such concept-based fear conditioning leads to enhanced memory representations for conditioned objects. Participants were presented with a heterogeneous collection of images of animals and tools. Objects from one category were reinforced by an electrical shock, whereas the other category was never reinforced. Results confirmed concept-based fear learning through subjective report of shock expectancy, heightened skin conductance responses, and enhanced 24h recognition memory for items from the conditioned category. These results provide novel evidence that conditioned fear can generalize through knowledge of object concepts, and sheds light on the persistent nature of fear memories and category-based fear responses symptomatic of some anxiety disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 185 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 23%
Student > Master 33 17%
Researcher 30 15%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 20 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 104 54%
Neuroscience 21 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 6%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 32 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2021.
All research outputs
#853,997
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biological Psychology
#81
of 1,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,631
of 245,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Psychology
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.