| Title |
Titin mutations and muscle disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00424-019-02272-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dalma Kellermayer, John E. Smith, Henk Granzier |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 31 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 32 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,706,953
of 25,223,158 outputs
Outputs from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#139
of 2,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,973
of 358,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,223,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.