↓ Skip to main content

Better Approaches to Managing Drought in the American Southwest

Overview of attention for article published in Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Better Approaches to Managing Drought in the American Southwest
Published in
Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, March 2019
DOI 10.1029/2019eo118533
Authors

Patrick Lambert, Timothy Titus, Andrea Ostroff

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,601,876
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union
#2,334
of 3,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,836
of 364,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union
#70
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,872 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.