↓ Skip to main content

Comparing internet and face-to-face surveys as methods for eliciting preferences for social care-related quality of life: evidence from England using the ASCOT service user measure

Overview of attention for article published in Quality of Life Research, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Comparing internet and face-to-face surveys as methods for eliciting preferences for social care-related quality of life: evidence from England using the ASCOT service user measure
Published in
Quality of Life Research, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11136-019-02172-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eirini-Christina Saloniki, Juliette Malley, Peter Burge, Hui Lu, Laurie Batchelder, Ismo Linnosmaa, Birgit Trukeschitz, Julien Forder

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 19%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Professor 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 25 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Psychology 4 5%
Other 18 23%
Unknown 29 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2019.
All research outputs
#5,986,812
of 23,138,859 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#572
of 2,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,256
of 351,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#15
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,138,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,927 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.