You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Wearable activity trackers, accuracy, adoption, acceptance and health impact: A systematic literature review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biomedical Informatics, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103153 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Grace Shin, Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi, Yu Fei, Amir Karami, Nicci Gafinowitz, Ahjung Byun, Xiaopeng Lu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Germany | 1 | 17% |
| Japan | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 558 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 558 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 71 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 63 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 8% |
| Researcher | 43 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 5% |
| Other | 99 | 18% |
| Unknown | 210 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 65 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 6% |
| Engineering | 32 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 31 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 5% |
| Other | 136 | 24% |
| Unknown | 231 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2019.
All research outputs
#7,717,825
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Informatics
#653
of 2,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,092
of 363,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Informatics
#16
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.