You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
VERDICT MRI for Prostate Cancer: Intracellular Volume Fraction versus Apparent Diffusion Coefficient
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiology, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1148/radiol.2019181749 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edward W. Johnston, Elisenda Bonet-Carne, Uran Ferizi, Ben Yvernault, Hayley Pye, Dominic Patel, Joey Clemente, Wivijin Piga, Susan Heavey, Harbir S. Sidhu, Francesco Giganti, James O’Callaghan, Mrishta Brizmohun Appayya, Alistair Grey, Alexandra Saborowska, Sebastien Ourselin, David Hawkes, Caroline M. Moore, Mark Emberton, Hashim U. Ahmed, Hayley Whitaker, Manuel Rodriguez-Justo, Alexander Freeman, David Atkinson, Daniel Alexander, Eleftheria Panagiotaki, Shonit Punwani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 47% |
| United States | 7 | 23% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 47% |
| Scientists | 8 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 19% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 20% |
| Unknown | 19 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 18% |
| Engineering | 11 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 10% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 33 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,627,872
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Radiology
#1,057
of 10,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,768
of 364,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiology
#29
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,272 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.