↓ Skip to main content

Spatiotemporal dynamics of neocortical excitation and inhibition during human sleep

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
189 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
376 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spatiotemporal dynamics of neocortical excitation and inhibition during human sleep
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2012
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1109895109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrien Peyrache, Nima Dehghani, Emad N. Eskandar, Joseph R. Madsen, William S. Anderson, Jacob A. Donoghue, Leigh R. Hochberg, Eric Halgren, Sydney S. Cash, Alain Destexhe

Abstract

Intracranial recording is an important diagnostic method routinely used in a number of neurological monitoring scenarios. In recent years, advancements in such recordings have been extended to include unit activity of an ensemble of neurons. However, a detailed functional characterization of excitatory and inhibitory cells has not been attempted in human neocortex, particularly during the sleep state. Here, we report that such feature discrimination is possible from high-density recordings in the neocortex by using 2D multielectrode arrays. Successful separation of regular-spiking neurons (or bursting cells) from fast-spiking cells resulted in well-defined clusters that each showed unique intrinsic firing properties. The high density of the array, which allowed recording from a large number of cells (up to 90), helped us to identify apparent monosynaptic connections, confirming the excitatory and inhibitory nature of regular-spiking and fast-spiking cells, thus categorized as putative pyramidal cells and interneurons, respectively. Finally, we investigated the dynamics of correlations within each class. A marked exponential decay with distance was observed in the case of excitatory but not for inhibitory cells. Although the amplitude of that decline depended on the timescale at which the correlations were computed, the spatial constant did not. Furthermore, this spatial constant is compatible with the typical size of human columnar organization. These findings provide a detailed characterization of neuronal activity, functional connectivity at the microcircuit level, and the interplay of excitation and inhibition in the human neocortex.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
United Kingdom 7 2%
Switzerland 4 1%
France 4 1%
Japan 4 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 339 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 107 28%
Researcher 91 24%
Student > Master 40 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 25 7%
Professor 21 6%
Other 57 15%
Unknown 35 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 121 32%
Neuroscience 97 26%
Physics and Astronomy 27 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 7%
Engineering 24 6%
Other 44 12%
Unknown 38 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2021.
All research outputs
#5,998,986
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#56,079
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,493
of 254,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#428
of 808 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 808 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.